Chinese Vice Premier and top economic advisor to President Xi Jinping, Liu He, at the World Economic Forum in 2018. Credit: Ciaran McCrickard/World Economic Forum via Flickr
In the month since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Beijing’s foreign policy messages have been highly conflicted, as it attempts to maintain high-level support for Moscow while distancing China from the humanitarian costs and economic collateral damage of the conflict. Those mixed messages reflect not only the difficulty of reacting to Russian military setbacks on the ground, but a real split within China’s governing system: namely, between Political China and Technocratic China.
Political China is primarily concerned with how China can use its relationship with Russia to advance its interests in a longer-term competition with the United States and U.S.-led alliances. Political China also emphasizes the importance of moving toward a multipolar world order and resists engagement with Western institutions. In this view, self-sufficiency is more important than economic and political engagement, while interdependence is defined as making the rest of the world more dependent upon Chi
Exclusive longform investigative journalism, Q&As, news and analysis, and data on Chinese business elites and corporations. We publish China scoops you won't find anywhere else.
A weekly curated reading list on China from David Barboza, Pulitzer Prize-winning former Shanghai correspondent for The New York Times.
A daily roundup of China finance, business and economics headlines.
We offer discounts for groups, institutions and students. Go to our Subscriptions page for details.
Zhongguancun, a neighborhood in Beijing, has long been called 'China's Silicon Valley.' But after achieving remarkable success, Zhongguancun is now undergoing something of a makeover as China attempts to control what type of innovation happens there. Can Beijing reinvent Zhongguancun while still replicating its past success?